Page 1 of 1
Archived vs. Inactive Patients?
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:02 am
by Smilesbypayet
So what exactly is the difference between a patient who has been marked "Inactive" vs. "Archived?"
Re: Archived vs. Inactive Patients?
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:11 am
by JimZ
We use INACTIVE as not being seen in a given time frame (1yr, 2yrs, etc).
ARCHIVE for patients that have moved and will not be back.
Sorry, pretty vague, but a small distinction between the 2.
Jim
Re: Archived vs. Inactive Patients?
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:23 pm
by murmsk
It would seem to me that for those who still have written records
Inactive are those who are not expected to return but whose file is still stored in the main record store
archived are those whose records have been removed from the main record store and are now reside in the basement.
steve
Re: Archived vs. Inactive Patients?
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:19 pm
by jordansparks
Inactive will show by default in the select patient window. Archived will not. So if you archive them, then you are pretty much assuming that you will be creating a duplicate chart if they call back again at some point in the future. Archive can be handy for offices that truly will never see the patient again. For example, a pedo office.
Re: Archived vs. Inactive Patients?
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:20 am
by islanddoc808
Sorry to necro old threads, but why would you need to create a duplicate chart for an archived patient? Why not just unarchive?
Mahalo
Ben
Re: Archived vs. Inactive Patients?
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:15 am
by gdbanks
Inactive will show by default in the select patient window. Archived will not. So they appear to be new patient to the office so a new chart would be made. unless the patient inform the office that they are returning to the office letting the front desk know to look in the archived patient files.