Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro

For users or potential users.
Post Reply
tpatel
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:45 am

Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro

Post by tpatel » Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:55 am

Need some advice on which os to select. We are opening a new office and need to order a server. Current office has a Windows Server 2011 and have multiple issues with the network frequently requiring the services of an IT person.
In light of this we are leaning towards utilizing windows 7 pro on the server. We expect to have approx 10-12 workstations and are going to use XDR for imaging.
Any suggestions or advice?
Thanks

teethdood
Posts: 267
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 12:39 am
Location: Visalia, CA
Contact:

Re: Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro

Post by teethdood » Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:41 pm

Most dental offices don't need windows server. Save your money and go with consumer windows. I suggest windows 8.1 Pro. Better yet, look into a "virtual server" by searching for posts on here.
Philip H. Doan, DDS
http://www.kaweahdental.com/

User avatar
jsalmon
Posts: 1551
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro

Post by jsalmon » Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:14 pm

All versions of windows 7 have a maximum of 20 simultaneous connections for a windows file share (basically your OpenDentImages folder). Windows Server 2012 does not have a limit... So if you plan on growing at all, I'd recommend server.
The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.

Jason Salmon
Open Dental Software
http://www.opendental.com

User avatar
Justin Shafer
Posts: 596
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 7:34 pm
Location: Fort Worth, TX.

Re: Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro

Post by Justin Shafer » Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:49 pm

You will save money on hardware... but I think the hardware in high dollar servers in the 3k range.. have more reliable hardware.. that statement failed on a dell t300.. butI got it swapped out for a t310 and all was well... kind of like buying a nice car.. usually you get your moneys worth..... most of the time. Got clients with a workstation upgraded to raid 1 and iI have clients on dell servers... money is an issue.. well rich has those clients now.. most of em. =)

JLM
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 12:52 pm

Re: Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro

Post by JLM » Mon Nov 11, 2013 2:40 pm

My server is windows homeserver 2011 and I don't have any issues. I tried 2012 and had all kinds of issues. It tries to force you to setup a domain that you probably don't want or need. If you google around you can find instructions on how to go back to workgroups. Mainly, SMB3 hates on ISAM databases and I had three running at the time. Now I just have one.

AFAIK, non server versions of windows (like Win 7 pro) only allow 10 users. I tried it and since we have 11 computers hitting the server, we had all kinds of issues with users connecting to shares. Strangely, I thought that WHS2011 was limited to 10 shares as well but we haven't had any issues with 11 computers running OD.

Jim Margarit

User avatar
irfan
Posts: 216
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 9:09 am

Re: Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro

Post by irfan » Mon Nov 11, 2013 7:17 pm

we use SBS 2011 Essentials... does everything I need. I was just using a Win7 pro and things were fine, but I wanted things on a domain. SBS 2011 Essentials was the cheapest way in, and has been solid in reliability..

epicurean
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:18 pm

Re: Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro

Post by epicurean » Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:58 pm

Hi Irfan,

Could you share what are the advantages of a domain? I too am using Windows 7 pro only and things are working well with 6 stations

User avatar
irfan
Posts: 216
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 9:09 am

Re: Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro

Post by irfan » Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:21 am

If it works stick with it :)

I wanted centralized management of security and preferences, without having to repeat steps for every workstation. Makes things more complicated with a domain actually, so I wouldn't recommend it unless you really need it (you don't).

Post Reply